Legal Opinion

Cogdill v. Aetna Life Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1931No. 6,833PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The compensation statutes of different states are as varied as the amendments of the various legislatures have made possible. However, the principles applicable are similar in some of the statutes and the question here involved has been passed upon by the supreme courts of some of the states. It is held quite generally that under similar statutes regarding commutation of payments, a lump sum settlement cannot be awarded without the consent of the parties. (Coker v.Avondale Mills, 208 Ala. 268, 93 So. 900; Pierce v.Boyer-Van Kuran Lumber Coal Co., 99 Neb. 321, L.R.A. 1916D, 970, 156 N.W. 509;…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Nicholson v. Roundup Coal Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Landeen v. Toole County Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hiebert v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Laukaitis v. Sisters of Charity of LeavenworthMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kuehn v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Davis v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hock v. Lienco Cedar ProductsMontana Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API