Legal Opinion
Neiberger v. Hawkins
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 22, 2002No. CIV.A.99-B-1120 (MJW)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs James Neiberger, Danford El-dridge, Paul Gardner, Terence Jacobs, Bradley Glennie, David Snyders, Lawrence Eu-bank and Allen Hall (“Plaintiffs”) bring claims for violation of the Care and Treatment of the Mentally 111 Act (“Treatment Act”), common law negligence/ negligence per se, violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and violation of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act against Defendants Robert Hawkins, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- A.W. v. Jersey City Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Purvis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.