Legal Opinion · Dissent

Casner v. Daily News Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1940No. S. F No. 16076Published

1Dissent

EDMONDS, J., Dissenting.

Ordinarily, a dissenting opinion upon a question concerning procedure only adds uncertainty in a field where the profession’s aim should be toward simplification. But the decision of the majority in the present case, it seems to me, gives a plaintiff rights which are not consistent with fair dealing and strikes down long established principles relating to the administration of justice.

The result is reached by the application of the supposed rule that there can be no judgment rendered upon a directed verdict unless the jury actually proceeds, under compulsion of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Umsted v. Scofield Engineering Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Baird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bee Building Co. v. DaltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API