Rayson v. Rush
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.
This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which plaintiff seeks a declaration that he is entitled to a 37 per cent interest in a patent on a lawn and parking lot sweeping machine, and in the proceeds of the sale of the patent. He also asked for an accounting of what is due him from money received by defendant or by others on defendant’s behalf.
The parties agreed that the case was equitable in nature and it was tried accordingly. After hearing the evidence the trial court held that plaintiff was not entitled to relief, and entered a decree dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff appeals.
When a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Quincy v. SturhahnIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Oregon Farm Bureau v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Central Oregon Irrigation District v. Deschutes CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fitzgibbon v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Russell's Realty, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Burks v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Hempe v. HempeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Thorson v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.