Legal Opinion

City of Quincy v. Sturhahn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1960No. 35490PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

The plaintiff, the city of Quincy, desired to remove the parkway in the center of Twenty-fourth Street between Vermont and Broadway streets within the city and pave the street from curb to curb. The defendants, who owned property abutting the street, and the city claimed fee title to the land upon which the parkway was located. Consequently, the city filed a suit for declaratory judgment to determine the rights of the parties in the parkway. A freehold is involved and direct appeal to this court is authorized. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1957, chap. 110, par. 75.

The circuit court of Adams County entered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. City of JolietIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Board of Supervisors v. City of LincolnIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Melin v. Community Consolidated School District No. 76Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Burgard v. Mascoutah Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hickey v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. LaMonte v. City of BellevilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Stahelin v. Bd. Ed. SD No. 4 DuPage CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Levin v. Civil Service CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API