Legal Opinion
Aiello v. Garahan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Appellate Division’s determination that it was error to have set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, although appealable, is beyond the scope of our review (Mongelli Carting Co. v Nassau Ins. Co., 57 NY2d 649; Rudes v Walrath, 56 NY2d 703; Noia v De Rosa, 54 NY2d 631; Gutin v Mascali & Sons, 11 NY2d 97; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 148, p 588). Due to the posture in which this case comes before us, there must be an automatic…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gutin v. Mascali & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Pfohl v. WippermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Noia v. De RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. Green Island Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Goehle v. Town of SmithtownNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vadala v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- McGinn v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Spivak v. HeywardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Reynolds v. MorfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Ficorilli v. ThomsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.