Legal Opinion
Noia v. De Rosa
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 18, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We find no error of law in the charge to the jury given by the trial court, and the order of the Appellate Division should not be reversed on that ground.
Insofar as the determination of the Appellate Division to reverse the Trial Term’s order for a new trial and to *633reinstate the jury verdict was based on that court’s evaluation of the weight of the evidence it is not subject to our review (Donigi v American Cyanamid Co., 43 NY2d 935; Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 NY2d 597).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pfohl v. WippermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Donigi v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vadala v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Corley v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Dubois v. VanderwalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Tarantino v. Vanguard Leasing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Ebanks v. Triboro Coach Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.