Legal Opinion
Pfohl v. Wipperman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1974PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents, in the following memorandum: Our court has jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. We conclude, however, that there are presented only questions of fact as to the weight of the evidence and no question of law. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is outside our power of review. (Armstrong v. Campbell, 30 N Y 2d 704; Cameron v. Permakoff, 28 N Y 2d 938; Indiere v. Strickroth, 28 N Y 2d 513; Musumeci v. Pillsbury Mills, 11 N Y 2d 948; Gutin v. Mascali & Sons, 11 N Y 2d 97; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Halvorsen v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Vadala v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Pollicina v. Misericordia Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Noia v. De RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. Green Island Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.