Umpqua Valley Bank v. Wilson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The principal errors assigned by defendant are that the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; that it erred in making the several findings of fact; and that the court also erred in permitting plaintiff to introduce any testimony at the trial of the cause which had to do with any oral promise alleged to have been made by plaintiff H. L. Wilson to J. 0. Lystul, Thomas A. Lawson or to the plaintiff.
The question in' this case is whether or not the promise made by the plaintiff to Lystul and Lawson to pay the plaintiff bank is within the statute of frauds.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Williams v. Commercial National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reid v. KierOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Eilertsen v. WEBEROregon Supreme Court · 1953
- White Stag Manufacturing Co. v. Wind Surfing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Sandgren v. Cain Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- American Bank v. Port Orford Cedar Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.