Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Peters
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 24, 2000No. CIV. A. 98-0875 PLFPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and on plaintiff Eddie A. Curtis’ motion for class certification. Both plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor J. David Carroll (collectively “plaintiffs”) contend that the Air Force violated its statutory directives when it used certain complex procedures to review their candidacies for promotion from Major to Lieutenant Colonel. Because plaintiffs were denied promotions in two consecutive years, they were discharged under the Air Force’s “up or out” policy. Plaintiffs ask to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Goldman v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bates v. Northwestern Human Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Doe v. U.S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Bryson v. Shumway, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.