Legal Opinion

King v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 19, 2002No. 02-5065PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Major Philip King appeals from the United States Court of Federal Claims, which granted the government’s motion for summary judgment and denied Major King’s cross-motion for summary judgment. King v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 701 (2001). We affirm because we agree with the Court of Federal Claims that the Air Force’s method of recommending officers for promotion does not violate 10 U.S.C. §§ 616 and 617 (2000) and that the issue of Major King’s reassignment to another Air Force Base was nonjustieiable.

BACKGROUND

The background facts of this case are fully set…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Antonellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Antonellis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API