Legal Opinion
Tyner v. Stults
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1918No. 14383PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered October 20,1916, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for rescission, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This action was brought by respondent to rescind a contract for the exchange of certain properties.
After some preliminary negotiations, appellants agreed to trade a house and lot then owned by them in the city of Everett and valued at $2,200, the consideration being $625, to be paid in cash and real estate, upon which there was then due $215, and a first mortgage upon forty acres of land for $1,340. Respondent sought *169the trade in answer to an advertisement which reads as follows:
“A gilt-edge $1,300 first mortgage to trade for residence property in Everett. See Ward S. Bowman, 412 Colby.”
One…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Knappen v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- O'Dell v. BurnhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Colpe v. LindblomWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Angel v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Snakski v. Washington State Colonization Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cain v. NormanWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Mogul Logging Co. v. Smith Livesey Wright Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Williams v. LambNevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Kracke v. CohenWashington Supreme Court · 1922