Legal Opinion

Snakski v. Washington State Colonization Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1909No. 7589PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered June 1,1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits, in an action to rescind a contract for the sale of real property.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought by the respondents to rescind a contract of sale of real estate, and to recover damages on account of the failure of appellant to convey to the respondents a good title. The case was tried to the court and a jury, and the result was a judgment of rescission, and for a return of the money paid, and damages, amounting altogether to the sum of $634.50. Defendant has appealed. It alleges that the court erred, (1) in overruling a general demurrer to the complaint; (2) in not granting appellant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and facts proven; and (3) in certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Ankeny v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reeves v. McClainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  2. Hopper v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Sixta v. OchsnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Empey v. Northwestern & Pacific HypotheekbankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Crawford v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API