Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Fisk

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1933No. 1175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted primarily upon promissory notes. A great many persons and corporations were named as parties defendant, and recovery was sought as to them on various grounds and theories. To make ai clear statement of the different issues involved below would lengthen this opinion to an unprecedented extent. The law questions presented can be determined without a full statement, and we shall, therefore, pass on the assignments, making only such statements in connection therewith as are deemed necessary for an understanding of our holdings. The judgment rendered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landa v. HeermannTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Housewright v. HousewrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Shawnee Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Kile v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Frick v. GiddingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. First State Bank of Tenaha v. CollinsworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Go Leasing, Inc. v. Groos National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Stevenson v. Record Pub. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Johnson v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API