Legal Opinion

Kile v. Arrington

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1929No. 526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

A jurisdictional question involving fundamental error is apparent on the face of this record, which requires a dismissal of. the proceeding. The statement of the ease will include only so much of the proceedings as throw light upon this particular question. For convenience, plaintiff in error will be called plaintiff and defendants in error defendants.

This suit was instituted by plaintiff against John Greinecks as principal and W. J. Ar-rington, B. B. Chappel, and T. J. Valias as sureties ón a replevy bond in garnishment. Chas. O. Austin, banking commissioner of Texas, was also made a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNairy v. CastleberryTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Hamilton v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Wheeler v. GoffeTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. FiskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Johnson v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Henneman Grain & Seed Co. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API