Williams v. Casebeer
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
—Action for malicious prosecution. Trial by jury, and plaintiffs had the verdict with damages assessed at two thousand dollars, for which amount and for costs of suit, taxed at one hundred and sixty-two dollars and eighty cents, plaintiffs had judgment. Defendant appeals from the judgment in L. A. Ho. 514, and from an order denying motion for new trial in this transcript, L. A. Ho. 611. The two appeals-will be considered in this opinion.
It is sought to have the judgment and order reversed on the-grounds: 1. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict; 2. That the judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hahn v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Cavallaro v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Moody v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Work v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dennis v. Crocker-Huffman Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.