Legal Opinion
System Management Arts, Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 2000No. 97 Civ. 8101(RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff System Management Arts Incorporated (“Smarts”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment (1) excluding “Delphi” software developed by Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”) as relevant prior art in this patent infringement action, and (2) dismissing the Second, Fourth, and Fifth counterclaims of defendants Avesta Technologies, Inc. (“Avesta”) and David Zager (“Zager”) (collectively the “Defendants”). Smarts has also moved, pursuant to Rule 56(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., to strike various portions of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- B & G PLASTICS, INC. v. Eastern Creative Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Arrow International, Inc. v. Spire Biomedical, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Gleason Works v. Oerlikon Geartec, AGDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2001
- System Management Arts Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.