Legal Opinion
System Management Arts Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 4, 2001No. 97 CIV 8101 RWSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff System Management Arts Incorporated (“Smarts”) has moved for an order revising this Court’s previous opinion denying Smarts’ motion for partial summary judgment against defendants Avesta Technologies, Inc. (“Avesta”) and David Zager (collectively, the “Defendants”), on the grounds of newly-discovered evidence, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
The Parties
The parties in this action are set forth in the previous opinion of this Court, familiarity with which is presumed. See System…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. And Bard Access Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Buckeye Steel Castings CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Absolute Nevada, LLC v. Grand Majestic Riverboat Company LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Cunningham v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Geo-Group Communications, Inc. v. ChopraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- M.K., a minor, by and through her mother Sharmil Surujnath v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Marhone v. CasselDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.