Legal Opinion

Gleason Works v. Oerlikon Geartec, AG

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 30, 2001No. 98-CV-6275LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff The Gleason Works (“Gleason”) brought this patent infringement action against defendants Klingelnberg-Oerlikon Geartec Vertriebs-GmbH (“Klingeln-berg”) 1 , Oerlikon Geartec, AG (“Cerlikon”) and Liebberr-America, Inc. (“Liebherr”). Gleason alleges that it is the holder of United States Patent No. 4,981,402 (“the 402 patent”), which was issued on January 1, 1991 and is entitled, “Multi-Axis Bevel and Hypoid Gear Generating Machine.” Gleason’s complaint alleges that Klingeln-berg, a German corporation, and Oerlikon, a Swiss…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. CA, INC. v. Simple. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  2. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. Jaccard Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
  3. M. Eagles Tool Warehouse, Inc. v. Fisher Tooling Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  4. University of Rochester v. GD Searle & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2003
  5. Carson Optical, Inc. v. RQ Innovasion Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API