Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Hall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 30, 1931No. 6 Div. 704PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, while engaged in work, with others, as an employee of the defendant, a carrier engaged in interstate commerce, in attempting to break a large rock with dynamite, that obstructed the free passage of defendant's trains over the Warrior branch, received personal injuries which necessitated the amputation of one of his legs six inches above the knee. To recover damages for that injury, he brought this suit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59), and recovered the judgment from which the defendant has appealed.

The complaint ascribed the injury to "the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Bowditch v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Leonidas v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Garing v. BoyntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. ManningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API