Leonidas v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while in the employ of defendant railway company as a section laborer, and caused by defendants’ alleged negligence.
The complaint consists of two causes of action, but at the conclusion of the evidence plaintiff elected to stand upon the second, and we shall therefore disregard the first.
The first contention of defendants is that the complaint does not allege sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action. The question was raised by demurrer…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Jacobs v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Stephens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Reed v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Thorpe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1886
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. LeonidasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wollan v. LordMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- Montgomery v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Palmer v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.