Legal Opinion

Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 6 Div. 84PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This action was brought by Mrs. Eileen Bennett, as administratrix of the estate of George Bennett, deceased, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59) for the death of the said George Bennett.

The defendant, in the action, the Birmingham Belt Railroad Company, at the time the plaintiff’s intestate received his fatal injuries, was engaged in interstate commerce,, and the said Bennett was an employee of the defendant, and, as such, was engaged in placing a box car, which was moving in interstate commerce over defendant’s line of railway, on one of its side tracks. This car…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Bowditch v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. KoskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aubrey v. HeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. FinlaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. ManningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Cheairs v. StollenwerckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API