Legal Opinion

Garing v. Boynton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1931No. 7 Div. 987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action on the case to recover damages for personal injuries. The complaint on which the case was tried consists of counts 2, 3, 5, and 6. Counts 2, 5, and 6, ascribe the plaintiff’s injuries to the negligence of defendants in maintaining an elevator in their store in Talladega, Ala., and count 3 alleges that plaintiff’s said “wounds, injuries or damages were the proximate consequence and caused by the wantonness and wilfullness of the defendants’ servants or agents while acting within the line or scope of their employment.”

The defendants’ pleas of contributory negligence, numbered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Brandon v. Progress Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Alabama Power Company v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. City of Birmingham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Tyson v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Johnson v. Johns Service Funeral Parlor, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API