Legal Opinion
Pineda v. Almacenes Pitusa, Inc.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided May 6, 1997No. CIV. 95-1884(SEC)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CASELLAS, District-Judge.
This sexual harassment, Title VII claim is before the Court on defendants’ separate motions to dismiss (Dockets #8, 9) which were duly opposed (Docket #20). Defendant Almacenes Pitusa, Inc. essentially alleges that the complaint against it should be dismissed because (a) the named party is non-existent; (b) plaintiff’s action was not brought within the 90-day statutory period; and (c) the action is time-barred. Co-defendants Domingo Vélez and Evelyn Lasalle— plaintiffs supervisor and store manager, respectively — assert that the complaint against them should be…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lacedra v. Donald W. Wyatt Detention FacilityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- Matos Ortiz v. Com. of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- Sanchez Ramos v. Puerto Rico Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Maldonado-Cordero v. AT & TDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Padilla Cintron v. Rossello GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.