Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillips

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1978No. Nos. 77-1283, 77-1428PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Miroyan and McGinnis appeal from their convictions for several drug-related offenses. They raise several contentions, including a serious issue regarding the sensitive balance between the official use of sophisticated electronic surveillance devices and fourth amendment rights. Their fourth amendment contention is foreclosed, however, by recent decisions of this court and, since the remaining assertions are unpersuasive, we affirm.

I

In early May 1976, Miroyan made arrangements with Aero Trends, Inc. in San Jose, California, to rent a Cessna aircraft from 2:00 p. m. on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Justin Rone, United States of America v. Roy Dupont LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. ZemekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. AtchesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API