United States v. Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Miroyan and McGinnis appeal from their convictions for several drug-related offenses. They raise several contentions, including a serious issue regarding the sensitive balance between the official use of sophisticated electronic surveillance devices and fourth amendment rights. Their fourth amendment contention is foreclosed, however, by recent decisions of this court and, since the remaining assertions are unpersuasive, we affirm.
I
In early May 1976, Miroyan made arrangements with Aero Trends, Inc. in San Jose, California, to rent a Cessna aircraft from 2:00 p. m. on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Justin Rone, United States of America v. Roy Dupont LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. ZemekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. AtchesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.