Legal Opinion

Mayflower Transit, L.L.C. v. Troutt

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided August 19, 2004No. 1:04-cr-00030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

MARTINEZ, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff Mayflower Transit L.L.C.’s (“Mayflower”) “Motion for Default Judgment Against Eric Troutt and Amy Troutt and Brief in Support Thereof’ (“Motion”) and Mayflower’s “Request for Entry of Default Judgment and Memorandum in Support” (“Request”) filed on March 25, 2004 and June 7, 2004, respectively, in the above-captioned cause. As of the date of this order, Defendants Eric Troutt and Amy Troutt (“Defendants” or “the Troutts”) have neither responded to the Motion nor have they…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. New York Life Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  2. Lyons v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API