Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beck v. Gleason

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1938No. 33,570PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto, authorized by chapter 270 of the Laws of 1937, to oust defendant from the unlawful practice of medicine and surgery. The case is now presented for the determination of certain questions of law which arise upon the pleadings in advance of the trial of the facts, as authorized by G. S. 1935, 60-2704 and 60-2902. Therefore, it is deemed prudent to set out the pleadings.

The petition, omitting paragraphs 1 and 2 and the prayer, reads:

“3. That the defendant, B. L. Gleason, is not now, nor was he at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Tatlow v. BaconSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. State v. CreditorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v. FooteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Vest v. CobbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Gumbhir v. Kansas State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Wheat v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API