Legal Opinion

Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-2164PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COHILL, Chief Judge.

Before us, for the second time, is defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company’s (“State Farm”) motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, we will deny the motion to dismiss and once again order the case remanded to California.

Background

This case arises as a result of a fire which occurred at the plaintiffs’ residence in Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania on October 19, 1981. At the time of the fire the plaintiffs were en route to California where they intended to live. Their house in Beaver Falls was for sale at the same time and was insured by State…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Charles E. Abels and Irene C. Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Hayman Cash Register Co. v. SarokinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Joyner v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Arthur v. E.I. Du PontDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1992
  3. Poulos v. NAAS Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1990
  4. Graver v. VariousDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Abdullah v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API