Legal Opinion
Joyner v. Reno
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 7, 2006No. Civil Action 00-2006 (RBW)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff commenced this action alleging several violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), negligence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against various federal and District of Columbia agencies and their officers. Amended Complaint (“Amend.Compl.”) ¶¶ 19, 25-28. Currently before the Court is the Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Def.’s Mot.”). 1 For the reasons set forth during the September 29, 2006, status conference, and as further discussed below, the Court will again transfer this case to the Middle District of Pennsylvania.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gipson v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Coltrane v. LappinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Pan Am Flight 73 Liaison Group v. DaveDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Bullock v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- FMC Corp. v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.