Legal Opinion
Arthur v. E.I. Du Pont
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided September 17, 1992No. Civ. A. 2:92-0682PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is the Plaintiffs’ motion to remand this action to the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia (the circuit court). For reasons set out more fully below, the Plaintiffs’ motion is hereby GRANTED.
The Plaintiffs claim that the Defendant DuPont deliberately and intentionally exposed Ms. Arthur to hazardous chemicals. The claim is based in part upon W. Va. Code § 23-4-2 (Supp.1992). A brief summary of this case’s procedural history is warranted.
Plaintiffs filed their complaint in this action on June 1, 1990. DuPont was never served…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Luther Weems v. Louis Dreyfus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Mancel E. Tedder v. F.M.C. Corporation, Appeal of F.M.C. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Whitcomb v. SmithsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lindsey Hoyt v. Lane Construction CorporatiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Vogel v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Gandy v. CromptonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999
- Watson v. Appalachian Power Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- Lewis v. Armstrong Steel Erectors, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.