Legal Opinion

Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. and Mike Latta v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, Llc

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2012No. 09-0901PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett

We deny the motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion of August 26, 2011 and substitute the following in its place.

The Texas Constitution safeguards private property by declaring that eminent domain can only be exercised for “public use.” 1 Even when the Legislature grants certain private entities “the right and power of eminent domain,” 2 the overarching constitutional rule controls: no taking of property for private use. 3 Accordingly, the Natural Resources Code requires so-called “common carrier” pipeline companies to transport carbon dioxide “to or for the public for hire.” 4 In other…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Continental Casualty Insurance Co. v. Functional Restoration AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Harris County Flood Control District v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. City of Houston v. James & Elizabeth CarlsonTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  4. John Boerschig v. Trans-Pecos Pipeline, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. Forest Oil Corp. v. El Rucio Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API