Beckett v. Gridley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Stearns county, Searle, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after verdict in favor of defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
The plaintiff brought this action upon two promissory-notes, claiming to be a bona fide purchaser. The notes were made payable to H. J. Dresser or order, each for the sum of $500, — one due June 1, 1894, and the other due June 1, 1895; and the complaint alleged that he duly assigned them to plaintiff. before due. The answer admits the malting and delivery of the notes, and alleges that plaintiff took them after due, with full knowledge of the existence of certain defenses set up in the answer, and that the notes were made for the consideration or price of a Perdieron stallion, called Draco,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- St. Paul & Minneapolis Trust Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Denver Horse Importing Co. v. SchaferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Kavli v. LeifmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Union Investment Co. v. F. M. Landon Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Berry Asphalt Co. v. Apex Oil Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.