Legal Opinion
H & L OPERATING CO. v. Marlin Oil Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 19, 1987No. 56924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Vice Chief Justice.
This action is an appeal from the Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma in Cause No. 80496 which involves an application to drill an off-pattern well in Section 14, Township 2 West, Range 9 ECM in Cimarron County, Oklahoma. Section 14 above is established as a 640-acre drilling and spacing unit, and the order establishing it provided the well on the unit should be not less than 1,320 feet from the unit boundary. H & L Operating Company sought permission to drill at a location 660 feet north of the south line and 1,320 feet west of the east line. Hearing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DLB Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- French Petroleum Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- French Petroleum Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Hatlestad v. Petrocorp Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996