Legal Opinion

Hatlestad v. Petrocorp Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1996No. 83947Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARGRAVE, Justice.

This ease presents an appeal from a hotly-contested proceeding before the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, which resulted in the establishment of the Hunter (Misener) Unit covering parts of sections 6, 7, 8 and 17, Township 27 North, Range 10 West, Alfalfa county, Oklahoma, and approval of the plan of unitization submitted by Petrocorp Incorporated. Only one party, the appellant Jo Ann Hatlestad, has appealed from the Commission’s order.

The appellant is the owner of the surface and minerals of an approximately 66-acre tract designated “Tract 1” in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Samson Resources Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Chenoweth v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. H & L OPERATING CO. v. Marlin Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API