Legal Opinion
Syring v. Sartorious
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 1971No. 700PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.
This cause is in this court on appeal from a judgment of the trial court holding that defendant M. A. Sartorious has a valid lien upon plaintiffs’ proportionate share of operating expenses of producing oil wells. Plaintiffs, feeling aggrieved by this action of the trial court, filed their notice of appeal on questions of law and fact and assigned the following errors:
“1. The judgment and order of the court is irrespon-sive and not pertinent to the issues raised by the pleadings.
“2. The judgment and order of the court is contrary to 'law and against the weight of the evidence ' ’
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ketchum v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Fallon v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Johnson v. CraigSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aerel, S.R.L. v. Pcc Airfoils, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Katz v. BanningOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Landskroner v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Campbell v. KruppOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- General Insurance Company of America v. Edward F. Lowry and Kusworm & Myers Co., L. P. A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.