Reese v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
The Pittsburgh Railways Company, one of five defendants, appeals from the judgment on a verdict against it in an action of trespass for negligence. Nonsuits were entered in favor of the other defendants, and no appeal has been taken as to them. The judgment must be affirmed.
The statement of questions involved, which limits the scope of the appeal (Oil City Nat. Bank v. McCalmont, 303 Pa. 306; Keller v. N. J. Fidelity & Plate Glass Ins. Co., 306 Pa. 124), suggests but two points and, of course, they alone will be considered.
One alleges that the trial judge erred…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keller v. N. J. Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Oil City N. Bk., Exr. v. McCalmont, Exr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- MacFarlane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Spitzer v. Haims & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Strawn v. State Ex Rel. AnderbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Burke AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.