Murto v. McKnight
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer County; the lion. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtUpton, J.
In June, 1887, Robert McKnight was indebted to Dennis Murto for about §225 on a promissory note and book account. About that time McKnight went to Wichita, Kansas, to do some work, of which Murto was apprised. McKnight had in Keithsburg, Illinois (where all the parties in interest in this suit then resided), piroperty, real and personal, sufficient to meet his indebtedness.
In August, 1887, McKnight remaining in Kansas, and Murto learning that the family and some personal effects of McKnight’s were about to be removed thereto,, saw Charles McKnight, a son of Robert, and had the following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eddy v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
- Wilson v. BevansIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Power v. RankinIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Bunting v. DarbyshireIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kee v. CahillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
- Waterman v. ResseterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
- Mulkanoor v. Am. Home Mortg. Corp (In re Mulkanoor)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. SpearAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
- Rosewood Care Center, Inc v. CaterpillarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.