Lopez v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The appellants-defendants were found guilty by a jury, convicted of and sentenced for the crime of rape, that is, having carnal knowledge of a woman, forcibly and against her will, in violation of § 6-63(A), W.S.1957, 1975 Cum.Supp.1
The individual informations which were filed against the defendants were consolidated for trial, and the cases have been consolidated for purposes of this appeal. Two questions are presented by the appellants, which are:
1. Whether they were tried by an impartial jury. This question is premised upon information to the effect that a female member of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Stroble v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RoseArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Story v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.