Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Hogan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2001No. COA00-1319PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

John and Sylvia Hogan (“defendants” or “the Hogans”) appeal from an award of summary judgment for Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (“Lloyd’s”) on the question of whether defendants have presented sufficient documentation under the terms of their insurance policy with Lloyd’s to entitle defendants to recover for the loss of rents resulting from their condominium being damaged and unfit to live in. Having found no error of law, we affirm the ruling of the trial court.

Defendants are the owners of Condominium Unit 803 at Shell Island Resort Hotel in Wrightsville Beach, North…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Gaston County Dyeing MacHine Co. v. Northfield InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. MizellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Rouse v. Williams Realty Bldg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. NeislerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Cherry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Sitzman v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. North Carolina Counties Liability & Property Joint Risk Management Agency v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Ventura Kester, LLC v. Folksamerica Reinsurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API