Stott v. Stevens
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in their quiet title claim.1 They assign error to the court’s ruling that, at the time their property was platted in 1910, the grantors reserved property between their property and the Pacific Ocean and that defendants are the owners of that property. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse.
Plaintiffs are the present owners of residential lots 2 through 9 in block 1 of the Brooklyn Addition in Cannon Beach, originally platted by August and Sarah Becker. See Appendix. The western part of their property is on a bluff that overlooks the ocean.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Thornton v. HayOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Nelson v. VandemarrOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- McADAM ET UX v. SMITHOregon Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coussens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Partney v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Dept. of Transportation v. DietrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Ronald W. Hein and Linda M. Hein v. Steven Paul Carlson and Paulette Joan Carlson; and Clarence Lee Daniels and Mary Jo DanielsWyoming Supreme Court · 2026
- Vogel Vs. The Marla Bay Protective Ass'N, Inc. C/W 81424Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.