Legal Opinion

Endick v. Endick

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1884No. Case No. 4976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Callahan. Tried below before the Hon. T. B. Wheeler

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.—

This is an action for divorce, based on many averments of cruelty exercised by the husband towards the wife. There is no statement of facts contained in the transcript, and the errors assigned relate to the exclusion of evidence offered and to supposed defects in the charge of the court.

Under a long line of decisions, the rule has been fixed that, in the absence of a statement of facts, the correctness of charges given will not be considered, unless, under no facts which might have been proved under the pleadings, could the charge have been correct. Pfeuffer v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. FoleyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lockett v. SchurenbergTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Thompson v. CallisonTexas Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Torrey, Davidson & Grosscup v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. G. C. S. F. Ry. v. ShearerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
  3. Herndon v. DecordovaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Fasken v. FaskenTexas Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API