Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Bowser

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1980No. 1343PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Chief Justice.

This is a medical malpractice and products liability case. A. E. Bowser and his wife, Margarita Bowser, brought this action against Harold N. Cooper, M.D. (appellant), Leonard Cowan, Ciba-Geigy Corporation (Ciba-Geigy) and Merck and Co., Inc. (Merck) to recover damages for injuries sustained by Mr. Bowser. The Bowsers alleged that A. E. Bowser’s injuries were caused by the negligence of Dr. Cooper and his employee, Leonard Cowan, in using the drugs Sterazolidin (a Ciba-Geigy product) and Indocin (a Merck product) to treat an injury to Mr. Bowser’s right knee. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Technical Chemical Company v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Crocker v. Winthrop Laboratories, Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gravis v. Parke-Davis & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. McKee v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,013 Mary Kathryn Thomas v. Hoffman-Laroche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API