Orr & Lindsey Shoe Co. v. Ferrell
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Upshur. Tried below before the Hon. Felix J. McCord.
1Opinion of the Court
Willie, Chief Justice.
This case turns upon the construction of the deed of assignment made by W. H. Shepperd and R. L. Ferrell to Gr. C. Ferrell, for the benefit of their creditors. It is claimed by the appellant that the deed is void because it passes partnership property only, and provides for the discharge, of the assignors. The deed does provide for a discharge by consenting creditors, and, if it conveys partnership property only, is void under the decision in Donoho v. Fish Brothers, 58 Texas, 164.
The deed is in all material respects similar to the one passed upon in the case of Coffin…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coffin v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Donoho v. Fish Bros. & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1882
- Hill v. CunninghamTexas Supreme Court · 1860
- Moss v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- Torrey, Davidson & Grosscup v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
- San Antonio, U G. R. Co. v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. v. LowreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Lowry v. Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.