Legal Opinion

Francis v. Piper

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1999No. C1-99-67PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN F. THOREEN, Judge *

Alma Francis challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing her legal malpractice claim. Because Francis was not Piper’s client and was not an intended third-party beneficiary of the attorney-client relationship, we affirm.

FACTS

Alma Francis brought this action against LaMar Piper and the Piper Law Firm (collectively Piper), alleging Piper committed legal malpractice when he drafted a series of wills for Walter Heine, Francis’s brother. Heine, who had never married, had no children; Francis was his sole sibling and closest living relative.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Moen v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Thorsen v. Richmond Soc'y for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
  4. Noske v. FriedbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Leak-Gilbert v. FahleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API