State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Cookinham
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, filed a petition for declaratory judgment to determine if the defendant, Faith Cookinham, was entitled to uninsured motorist benefits under a policy issued by the plaintiff to her friend, John J. Welch. The Superior Court (Goode, J.) ruled that the defendant was not “insured” under the uninsured motorist provision of Welch’s policy because she was not “occupying” Welch’s vehicle when she was struck and injured by an uninsured vehicle. On appeal, the defendant contends that she was “occupying” the insured vehicle. We agree and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Haley v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Mondelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Smith v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- M. Mooney Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Akerley v. Hartford Insurance GroupSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Hahn v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Miller v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Whitcomb v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.