Legal Opinion

Cassady v. Signorelli

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1996No. A070382PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, P. J.

Appellant Donna Signorelli (mother) contends the trial court abused its discretion in making rulings regarding the custody and visitation rights of mother and respondent James Cassady (father), who are the parents of a young daughter, Grace, over whom they exercise joint legal custody. The trial court, inter alia, ordered mother not to remove Grace from the Bay Area to Florida, since this would not be in Grace’s best interests and would frustrate father’s rights of joint custody and visitation. The trial court also ruled father should have regular overnight visitation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re Marriage of RossonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People v. SernaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Lisa D. v. Carol F.California Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LaMusgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bryant v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Edlund v. HalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Lasich v. LasichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Navarro v. LamusgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API