Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Bryant

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 2001No. B145321PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

In an initial custody determination the trial court awarded primary physical custody to the mother, who intends to move with the children to New Mexico. Because the trial court found the move was not motivated by bad faith, it did not abuse its discretion. We affirm.

Facts

Michael A. and Laurel C. Bryant1 were married in 1985. They have two children of their marriage, ages six and nine. Before the parties had their first child they decided that Laurel would stay at home and be the primary caregiver to the children, while Michael would work to provide for the family. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cassady v. SignorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-KerttulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. City of San Diego v. D.R. Horton San Diego Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. In Re Marriage of LaMusgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lasich v. LasichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Melville v. MelvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API