Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Rosson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1986No. A028721PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.-

I. Introduction

In this case we hold that where the parent providing the primary residence for children decides, for legitimate job-related reasons, to move from the community in which the children have lived for a significant period of time and in which the other parent resides, this can be found to constitute a persuasive showing of changed circumstances affecting the children justifying modification of a custody order. The court can properly make this determination in advance of the move actually occurring. We also hold that a child of sufficient age and capacity to reason…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McLaughlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. In Re Marriage of WellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of MehlmauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Speelman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cassady v. SignorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cooper v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. E.M. v. K.H. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API