Legal Opinion
Security Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Trustmark Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 5, 2003No. CIV.3:01CV2198(PCD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY ARBITRATION
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to stay arbitration proceedings between it and third party defendant TIG Insurance Co. (“TIG”) pending the outcome of the present litigation. The motion to stay is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Familiarity with the prior rulings of this Court is presumed. TIG and plaintiff en tered into a Reinsurance Agreement (“Agreement”), effective January 1, 1999, which contains an arbitration clause providing that
As a condition to any right of action hereunder, any irreconcilable dispute between the parties to this Agreement…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Security Insurance Company Of Hartford v. Tig Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Lawrence v. Wilder Richman Securities Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Lawrence v. Wilder Richman Securities Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Security Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- G-Unit Film & Television, Inc. v. Jameson (In re Jackson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2016