Legal Opinion
Lawrence v. Wilder Richman Securities Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 4, 2005No. 3:04 CV 538(JBA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rulings on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. # 4]; Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #26]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff John F. Lawrence (“Lawrence”) moves to enjoin defendant Wilder Richman Securities Corp. (‘Wilder Rich-man”) from proceeding with the arbitration of Wilder Richman’s Statement of Claim against Lawrence before the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. during the pendency of this action. Wilder Richman has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion is denied, and defendant’s motion is granted.
I.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Leonard F. v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Susan A. Desiderio v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawrence v. RICHMAN GROUP OF CT LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Ege Kilinc v. PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026